When I heard Nestle was replacing all the artificial colors and flavors in its products with natural ingredients, I got excited. Not because I think that natural is automatically "better" than "chemical" flavors--but because there was an obvious opportunity for science (and an excuse for eating candy). So I went out as soon as I could and bought an artificial-flavor-filled, now discontinued Butterfinger bar, and put it in my dresser drawer for safe keeping.
Last week I went to the CVS and picked up a new, artificial-free Butterfinger bar. This weekend I recruited my mother, my mother's friend, and her two kids (one 10, one 5) to see if I could make a determination about whether there was any difference in the taste of the two bars.
Now, I would have loved to do a fully scientific procedure--triple-encrypted double blind, isolated tasting, quantitative scorecards, blindfolds, the whole shebang--but the kids really wanted to eat their candy, so the best I could do was a single-encryption double blind. I shooed everyone from the kitchen, unwrapped the candy bars, put them on two plates, one marked "A" and one marked "B", and recorded the position of each bar. Then I had the kids and their mom come in and decide whether to switch the bars or not, then to record their decision. Then I went back in the room and cut the bars up, and we sat down in the dining room to eat them.
Visually, there was a pretty obvious difference between the two. Bar A was a dull brown-orange color on the inside, where as Bar B was a startlingly bright orange. Sadly, it didn't occur to me to take pictures, but Bar B looked pretty much exactly like this:
My mother thought that Bar B was artificial and that it tasted better. My mother's friend thought that Bar A was artificial, but that Bar B tasted better. I forget which bar I thought was more artificial, but Bar B definitely tasted better to me, too. It was rich, nutty, and buttery, just like a Butterfinger is supposed to be. Bar A tasted like milk chocolate on nondescript cookie filler. The kids were too busy getting-sugar high to have any opinions, or at least any they were willing to waste time stuffing their faces to tell us about.
Bar A was natural, and Bar B was artificial. I think I am going to have to mourn the artificial Butterfinger's discontinuation, or hope that the folks at Nestle come up with a better-tasting formula. It was basically my favorite candy bar--but it's lost it's privileged place, now, because it's not the same. RIP, Butterfingers.
The dark secrets of delicious vegetarian and vegan cookery, as discovered by a dirty cheese-loving omnivore. May contain science.
Sunday, February 21, 2016
Friday, February 5, 2016
Master Brownies
So brownies are really, really simple as baked things go. What bothers me is that I can't find anywhere a sort of "master recipe" for brownies--just various individual recipes. By investigating some of these and doing some testing I've come up with a flexible brownie framework (never typed that phrase before) for making brownies on the fly, to your individual taste.
Dutch process cocoa gives an earthier flavor to brownies which many people prefer to the flavor of "natural" cocoa. Note that if you're using an actual brownie recipe, you can usually substitute one for the other, unless the recipe calls for any amount of baking soda. This is because dutch process cocoa is alkalized so that it has a neutral pH. Natural cocoa is acidic (pH ~= 5), so it's used to help activate baking soda in some recipes. If you really want the dutched-process flavor you can replace any baking soda in the recipe with 2-3 times the amount of baking powder, and it should work fine.
Here is a random photo of the nutritional label for a bar of baking chocolate:
This chocolate bar has 22g of fat and 0g of sugar per 42g. So we can assume that 20g of this is cocoa solids. One cup of cocoa powder is around 118g, so if we're supposed to use half a cup we need 59g. That means around 1.5 servings, or 4.5 sections, of chocolate.
Now we have to reduce the fat. From our 1.5 servings we have 22g*1.5=33g of fat. According to my nutrition label, vegetable oil is 100% fat, and weighs in at around 4.5g per teaspoon. 33/4.5 = 7.3, so we have 7.3 tsp = 2.5 tbs of fat. Subtract that from 1/2 a cup, and we only need 5.5 tbs of oil.
Another thing to keep in mind is that while shortening and oil are 100% fat, butter is only 80% fat--so you might need a little more butter, and in shortening or oil recipes you might need a little more water.
If using a smaller recipe, a flatter pan, or making brownie muffins/cupcakes, you should reduce the baking time and check on them more often. Especially for the cupcakes. See the square-cube law.
The really important ratio is 2 parts sugar:1 part cocoa:1 part fat:1 "egg-like"
Two eggs is roughly half a cup, for reference to the dry ingredients. So a brownie recipe might call for 1 cup sugar, 1/2 cup cocoa, 1/2 cup of oil or butter and 2 eggs (or 2 flax eggs, or the equivalent for your favorite egg substitute).Chemical leaveners
Unlike in cakes, chemical leaveners are totally optional. If you like cakier brownies, you should add around 1/2 tsp per cup of sugar (and up to 1 tsp if you like even cakier brownies). If you're a fudge brownie fan, you shouldn't bother unless you're using a non-leavening egg substitute (like a flax egg), in which case you should add around 1/2 tsp per cup of sugar.To Dutch or not to Dutch?
I was going to make a pun about that, because I misremembered and thought Hamlet was from the Netherlands, but anyway...Dutch process cocoa gives an earthier flavor to brownies which many people prefer to the flavor of "natural" cocoa. Note that if you're using an actual brownie recipe, you can usually substitute one for the other, unless the recipe calls for any amount of baking soda. This is because dutch process cocoa is alkalized so that it has a neutral pH. Natural cocoa is acidic (pH ~= 5), so it's used to help activate baking soda in some recipes. If you really want the dutched-process flavor you can replace any baking soda in the recipe with 2-3 times the amount of baking powder, and it should work fine.
Melted chocolate?
If you like your brownies extra chewy and fudgey, it sometimes helps to add melted chocolate instead of cocoa powder. You'll just need to reduce the oil to make up for the cocoa solids found in baking chocolate. You also might want to reduce the sugar, if the chocolate has added sugar in it. The nutrition label is very helpful for this:Here is a random photo of the nutritional label for a bar of baking chocolate:
This chocolate bar has 22g of fat and 0g of sugar per 42g. So we can assume that 20g of this is cocoa solids. One cup of cocoa powder is around 118g, so if we're supposed to use half a cup we need 59g. That means around 1.5 servings, or 4.5 sections, of chocolate.
Now we have to reduce the fat. From our 1.5 servings we have 22g*1.5=33g of fat. According to my nutrition label, vegetable oil is 100% fat, and weighs in at around 4.5g per teaspoon. 33/4.5 = 7.3, so we have 7.3 tsp = 2.5 tbs of fat. Subtract that from 1/2 a cup, and we only need 5.5 tbs of oil.
Butter vs Shortening or oil
Butter brings a more--well, buttery--flavor to your brownies. However, it tends to make them denser/less cakey. If you like fudgey brownies (I salute you!) then you can use oil or butter and it should come out okay. If you need them extra cakey, use shortening. (I haven't tested any of this, but there's a great article on it at The Kitchn)Another thing to keep in mind is that while shortening and oil are 100% fat, butter is only 80% fat--so you might need a little more butter, and in shortening or oil recipes you might need a little more water.
Baking time
I'm going to make another post on baking time calculations soon, but in the meantime, I have some general guidelines. Usually brownies should bake at around 350F (around 175C). A recipe with 2 cups of sugar will take around 40 minutes in the oven. It's done when the knife comes out clean.If using a smaller recipe, a flatter pan, or making brownie muffins/cupcakes, you should reduce the baking time and check on them more often. Especially for the cupcakes. See the square-cube law.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)